The need for clean water is a global issue that normally involves inadequate industry structures, economic difficulties, and geographical isolation. An innovation that resulted from these obstacles has been reusable bottles that filter water as a way to remove impurities and contaminants. When using personal health technology, hydration remains a foundational element yet not all water is purified to the same degree. Reusable bottles continue to grow in popularity however still have some imperfections.

In search of a better and more affordable bottle, the idea of using nanomachines as a way to filter the water was examined. Nanotechnology is the process of manipulating atoms on a nanoscale. With the use of nanotechnology, this self-cleaning bottle will have embedded nanoparticles that can help remove bacteria, viruses, and other contaminants making it safer to drink. It also helps maintain the temperature of the liquid inside keeping the cold drinks colder, or hot drinks hotter, for an extended period.

A self-cleaning water bottle using nanotechnology is better for the person drinking the water, and better for society as it limits the use of plastic. Overall, it has a significant impact on us and the environment.

Antibacterial Coating Bottle Analysis:

In the quest to remove bacterial risks and initiate safer hydration solutions, self-cleaning and antibacterial-coated bottles are the two most attractive innovations that happened recently. The purpose of such devices is to prevent the bacterial settling in the water bottles which makes the utensils safe and beneficial for the health of the users.

Antibacterial sprayed bottles may utilize special coatings using a technique to reduce bacterial growth although with varying efficiency depending on the technique or coating used. Although they may stop the invaders initially, as time passes the resistance power these coating layers have against bacteria colonization goes on decreasing due to wear and tear. While, self-cleaning water bottles with nanotechnology have more nanomaterials that actively degrade contaminants and inhibit microbial growth thus having more efficacy and lasting longer.

Furthermore, exploiting this microbicide material and its recycling is part of the effort to maintain its effectiveness and future-proofing the product. Violation of the operative maintenance procedures may jeopardize these implants’ ability to inhibit bacterial spread. Instead of requiring frequent maintenance, the nano-technologized self-cleaning water bottles’ nanomaterials formulated into their design function autonomously by addressing the problem of pollution and ensuring that the bottle is always clean.

Moreover, with the antibacterial pearls on coated bottles becoming weaker from time to time, the bacteria will soon start to colonize these surfaces. Such wearing-out may happen because of attrition as well as due to the influence of surrounding natural components. Contrary to that, the self-cleaning water bottles with the latest technology based on nanometrology fail to provide long-term durability due to the aforementioned nanomaterials which can be less effective over time.

With antibacterial-coated bottles not touching upon the dirt or grime particles around the bottle, this leaves the bottle vulnerable to being contaminated by external microbial sources. In a contrasting manner, a self-cleaning water bottle that uses nanotechnology not only prevents bacteria colonization but also repels dirt and grime within the bottle, thus, resulting in a clear environment for the bottle.

The environmental impact is the issue to be taken into account when we are contemplating these technologies. Antibacterial finishing may be environmentally problematic by using chemicals that present risks as well as the distribution of bottles with coatings conducive to pollution. In contrast, self-cleaning water bottles that make use of nanotechnology are aimed at making things more sustainable. Additionally, such is through the exertion of the responsible use of the cleaning agents and the less frequent cleaning services that are related to the bacterial infection.

In brief, these two technologies, bacterial-coated bottles and self-cleaning water bottles with nanotechnology intend to put an end to the bacterial colonization problem. However, while both of them aim to solve this problem, the one with nanotechnology appears to be more effective in terms of efficacy, maintenance requirements, long-lasting durability, resistance to dirt and grime, and even environmental impact. At a phase when humanity is purposely striving for clean and secure hydration solutions, we can see that nanotechnology self-cleaning bottles have a big role to play in ensuring our users are safe and environmentally friendly in the long run.

A UVC sterilization bottle is a particular kind of bottle that uses ultraviolet C (UVC) light to sterilize what’s inside. UVC light is a high-energy wavelength that is well-known for its germicidal qualities. It can effectively kill inactive bacteria, viruses, and other microbes by breaking their DNA or RNA.

Here’s how a UVC sterilization bottle typically works:

• Built-in UVC Light- The bottle has an internal UVC light source, typically an LED light source, installed in the cap or another location.
• Disinfection Process- The UVC light sterilizes the water or inside surface of the bottle by breaking down microbial DNA/RNA, blocking viability or reproduction. This wavelength is typically about 254 nm when the light is activated.
• Activation Mechanism- To prevent users from unintentionally being exposed to UVC radiation, these bottles usually feature a safety mechanism that makes sure the UVC light is not turned on when the bottle is open.
• Power Source- Typically, the UVC light source runs on rechargeable batteries.

Despite its advantages, a UVC sterilization bottle has some downsides that might make it worse than a nanotechnology bottle for certain uses:

• Safety Concerns- UVC radiation can cause damage to the skin and eyes of people. There’s a chance of exposure if the safety devices malfunction.
• Battery Dependency- UVC bottles need a power source to work, which can be inconvenient because they need to be recharged or have their batteries changed.
• Time necessary for Sterilization- UVC sterilization usually takes a few minutes, thus it might not be the best option for urgent use.
• Maintenance- UVC lamps need to be replaced because they have a limited lifespan and can lose some of their efficiency over time.

Although these two inventions attempt to strike the same purpose, one is more conventional than the other. The nanotechnology bottle is preferable because it provides a more certain way to guarantee clean water. Nanotechnology bottles use advanced filtration or antimicrobial coatings to eliminate germs, in contrast to UVC sterilization bottles, which have safety concerns and need to be charged or have batteries. This guarantees that there is no chance of dangerous radiation exposure, removes the need for waiting, and lowers maintenance. For consumers looking for consistent water filtration, the nanotechnology bottle is a more sensible option due to its increased convenience.

The Process of Innovation: Cost, Time, and Materials

Creating this innovation involves a manufacturing process that is normally based on the material used. For a self-cleaning bottle, the process includes: batch preparation, welding, cooling, and then any additional touches are added. This specific type of bottle undergoes batch preparation or material selection first where the right metals are chosen such as stainless steel. Sheet cutting is the next step where those metals are then cut into smaller pieces making them easier to handle. Deep drawing is done after which involves shaping the bottle into a cylindrical form and progressively stretching the material into the desired mold. The bottle is then welded together to create a secure piece of metal. In the final steps, there are finishing touches such as sanding the surface or coating the outside to prevent oxidation. Throughout the manufacturing process, we are constantly checking to ensure the bottle meets specific standards.

The use of nanotechnology would be added during the batch preparation step where materials are prepared. The nanomachines are a part that is embedded in the sides of the bottle similar to the outside of Figure 1. This process can typically be finished in about a day or two assuming everything else in the manufacturing process goes smoothly. One of the main factors considered when discussing cost was the use of nanotechnology that prevents the growth of bacteria and other microbes. It is made up of high-quality materials to ensure durability. The development of nanotechnology requires extensive research which significantly contributes to the cost. Additionally, nanoparticles alone are expensive, therefore a higher quality reusable bottle would be slightly more than an average bottle. The manufacturing process has been around for many years so it would not have a great impact on the cost. All of these factors working together play a role in the outcome which results in making the bottle cost around $25-$50. 

Speculations Sheet: Self-Cleaning Bottle with Nanotechnology :

Dimensions	Volume: 67 ouncesHeight: 12.4 inchesDiameter: 4.3 inchesWeight: 4.5 pounds
Temperature Retention	Keeps liquid cold for up to 24 hoursKeeps liquid hot for up to 6 hours
Materials	Stainless Steel
Colors Available	Forest GreenMatte BlackLavenderMidnight Blue
Features	Filters water through nanotechnologyLeak-Proof capWide for easy cleaning
Certifications	FDA approvedBPA Free
Care Instructions	Hand Wash OnlyNot Microwave Safe
Warranty	Lifetime warranty against manufacturer defects
Cost	$39.99

In conclusion, using nanotechnology as a way to purify water can be more beneficial to the person drinking and the environment. Innovations for reusable bottles continue to advance every day however, the difference with nanotechnology makes it safer to use. 

Citations

Cost-effectiveness of nanomedicine: Estimating the real size of nano-costs | Nanomedicine. (n.d.). https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/10.2217/nnm-2019-0130 

Nanotechnology for clean water: Facts and figures. SciDev.Net. (n.d.). https://www.scidev.net/global/features/nanotechnology-for-clean-water-facts-and-figures/ 

Clean water through nanotechnology: Needs, gaps, and fulfillment | ACS nano. (n.d.-a). https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.9b01730 

Antimicrobial beverage cups by contigo. Microban. (n.d.). https://www.microban.com/contigo 

Tempercraft. (n.d.). 32OZ bottle. TEMPERCRAFT. https://www.tempercraft.com/products/32oz-bottle 

Smart ultraviolet sterilization water cup. ZAG SAVANT. (n.d.). https://zagsavant.com/products/smart-ultraviolet-sterilization-water-cup-64473 

Over the course of the semester, I feel that I have grown as a writer and consistently exhibited many positive habits in my writing. The need for course learning objectives is crucial for pushing yourself to succeed and I have achieved a majority of them which can be seen throughout my work. Having course objectives forces one to think about different perspectives of writing and engage in different types of writing processes. This involves doing a lot of self-reflection. This is important as it is a way to help grow and notice critiques that impact the results of a person’s work. There are many ways to express ideas through different types of writing, and acknowledging them is important. This leads to the thought of what is writing.

I’ve learned that writing is more than just using symbols or letters as a way to communicate. It is an expression and connection towards the writer. The way a person writes says a lot about them and that is the significance of it. It is a way to portray yourself and craft your work to represent you. That is why it is important to write in different ways and take the criticism of others. You have to understand all aspects to find what suits you best. This course challenged our ability to write in different ways and it helped us acknowledge the in-depth meaning of writing. Each assignment focused on different course objectives that helped me improve my work, and open my mind to new writing perspectives.

All of the assignments forced me to adapt to a different style. The Technical Description assignment was a new type of assignment for me and was also the most fun to write. I enjoyed writing from a technical perspective as it was something that strengthened my practice evaluating and analyzing skills. I had to write from a stance similar to a manual which was new to me. The idea of writing about a technical object from the inside out and describing each detail was difficult for me to structure. I had to explain each piece and how it connected in a way the reader understood. This helped me improve my articulation and the use of online databases to help me provide the correct information. This was a course objective that I achieved because I explained each aspect well and provided pictures to help the reader visualize. This was a skill I did not know I was capable of doing and I do believe this assignment pushed me outside of my comfort zone.

The Engineering Proposal assignment did play a role in impacting my ability to work with others. This was a group project where we needed to create an innovation and visually bring it to life. This skill was new to me as I never worked with others as much as we did during this assignment. Additionally, I’ve never had an assignment that involved multiple people using their creativity together to create an idea. This was a difficult concept for me to grasp because I was never well at working with others. We all had different ideas and it was hard for us to come together to one idea. This is something that became clear I needed to work on to improve my work in the future. This course objective would be classified as developing and engaging in the collaborative and social aspects of the writing process which I would say I did not achieve to my full potential. However, the most impactful writing assignment that helped was the peer review. Doing peer review required us to communicate and take criticism of others. This helped strengthen my ability to take into account the ideas of others and use them as a way to improve my work. Peer review was a new concept to me and I enjoyed it because I thought it was interesting trying to understand how other people interpret my work. I have not achieved the goal of mastering communication or group work due to my lack of speaking on my perspective and letting the opinions of others decide the outcome. I struggle with confrontation when it comes to other people’s work and I need to improve on that. However, through this, I’ve learned to listen well to others even though I need to incorporate more of my ideas as well.

Additionally, during this course, I’ve developed a better rhetorical sensibility. I now think about who the audience is, the importance of language and tone, and the differences between persuading and informing. Rhetorical sensibility also includes ethics such as respecting the audience and being true to your words when providing statistics or factual information. This is a concept that I didn’t have before this course which is a goal I have achieved. It takes into account all the elements that can influence the effectiveness of one’s message. This is a skill that will be useful in the work field.

The Lab Report Analysis was an assignment where I had to find and annotate an engineering lab report and compare it to the eight elements in our required textbook. This assignment helped me significantly throughout the course because it gave me insight into every important aspect needed in a lab report. This made it easier for me to organize and structure my ideas for the reports after. This was my first assignment using APA format and using the CCNY library database. The skills I now have involving using these sources stem from this assignment. This course objective is classified as practicing using various library databases, and the internet to locate sources appropriate to your writing which is a goal I have achieved. This helped change my creative and opinionated perspective, to a factual, straightforward, and technical perspective. It helped me become a better writer and will be a useful skill in the future.

Overall, I can say that over the semester my writing has improved drastically from before taking this class. There were many skills I’ve developed but also many things I need to improve on. I’ve achieved some of the course learning objectives such as: enhancing strategies, engaging in genre analysis, and formulating and articulating a stance in my writing. However, I do need to continue to practice my skills in engaging in collaborative and social aspects and acknowledging others’ ranges of linguistic differences. This was a great course to take to improve my writing and the skills I’ve developed will help me in the future.

Lab reports are vital to scientists, engineers, a research team, and can be important to many others. They are used to spread information and what has occurred in an experiment. The process of writing a lab report helps the authors understand scientific concepts and understand how to communicate ideas. It involves critical thinking and analysis skills that develop through the more reports that one reads and analyzes. In the textbook Technical Communication by Mike Markel, chapter 19 explains how lab reports play an important role in understanding and solving a scientific problem in the real world. Lab reports are a way to communicate an experiment’s results and build on others’ work. It is important to write clearly and persuasively to engage the reader and prove the research provided is valid. There are eight elements described in this chapter that are seen through the lab report Capacity Design of Traditional and Innovative Ductile Connections for Earthquake-resistant CLT Structures.

The first element of a lab report is the title. This is the first aspect a reader encounters which is why it should be interesting and informative. According to Chapter 19, the title should be informative enough for the reader to decide whether the report interests or benefits them. It also helps other scientists and engineers save time when needing to locate information in that subject area. The title of the lab report, Capacity Design of Traditional and Innovative Ductile Connections for Earthquake-resistant CLT Structures, portrays the two types of connections that will be compared and states what they will be used for. The author chose an effective title of proper length that will benefit those interested. After the title, the abstract is presented which summarizes the entire report. It gives insight into the layout of the report and briefly addresses each section. It can include the purpose of the report, any major conclusions, and key findings. It makes it easier for the readers to understand the main point. On occasion, the abstract can express what questions the authors had that motivated the study and what was discovered. This section of a report plays a critical role by expressing a summary of the overall study. In the abstract of the lab report, the authors explained their reason for constructing the report and how they were going to accomplish any results. They introduced the flaws with cross-laminated timber (CLT) buildings and a way of improving them through creating a new connection built within them called innovative ductile connections. They explained how there were multiple factors that contributed to the flaws of CLT buildings such as their overestimation of strength. These buildings were designed to withstand a great amount of force however not all parts of the buildings were able to. As the demand for strength in the ductile components increased, the brittle components did as well which could not maintain stability like the stronger components. Throughout this report, the authors proposed some modifications to improve the CLT buildings reliability. This led to what will be explained in the introduction.

The introduction is the section in the report where the hypothesis is described and explains why the research is significant. This serves as the foundation of a report because it prepares the reader for the detailed descriptions that follow the introduction. It establishes what is going to be examined and creates a clear view of what is going to be discussed throughout the report. The introduction provides enough detail to help the readers understand how you conducted your research and the significance of the information. According to the textbook, the introduction should include a review of previous research relevant to the study and describe how this impacts the new experiment being attempted. Background information and context helps the readers understand the concepts of the text and why it is relevant. In the lab report, the introduction gave insight into common CLT structures and how they were built. The authors explained how the connections between the buildings are created to prevent the wall panels from sliding vertical or horizontally by brackets (or known as traditional connections). A majority of these connections are made with wood embedment which creates a pinching behavior between steel and timber. This limits the amount of energy the building can withstand. The history of traditional connections and the fact that more connections have been developed were included, which show flaws within how the buildings were designed. They were originally developed for light-frame shear walls, however the energy limitation is bounded by small-diameter fasteners which can only reciprocate the energy to the panels that can withstand the equal amount of force. The introduction of this lab report explained the problem that was happening, why it occurred, previous acknowledgment of other designs that enhanced the flawed building design, and what will be shown throughout the report. 

The materials and methods are part of a lab report that expresses to the reader that the report is credible. This section explains in detail the type of materials used because it can affect the outcome of an experiment. If another researcher attempts this experiment, they might aim to achieve different results and one way of doing so is to use a different type of material. Additionally, this is the section where the procedures taken are explained and any obstacles encountered are expressed. All of the relevant details are added and the reasoning behind any decisions the authors made during the experiment is explained. In the lab report, Capacity Design of Traditional and Innovative Ductile Connections for Earthquake-resistant CLT Structures, there was not a specified materials and methods section, like the introduction, however, the procedures, observations, and data collected were shown. Part of their experiment involved a conceptual model that visually expressed what their ideas were. They also used multiple equations to find the over-strength factor and show how the factor of the materials used plays a part in the results. These were two main parts of their experiment where the procedures were explained, but there was no materials section. The authors chose to present the information this way because the majority of the lab report is their ideas being calculated based on research from other buildings. They did have to compare a steel bracket that had already been developed, however in this report they had more data, formulas, and research that led them to their results.

The results are the section of a lab report where evidence that supports the claims are presented. The data is summarized and any extra information that was found can be explained. Everything found whether it supported the hypothesis or not, should be included. It is considered unethical if it is not included because science is based on proven information. False information is misleading and defeats the purpose of an experiment. Additionally according to the textbook, the data is presented after a statement if it includes graphs or formulas. In the lab report, a test results section is presented and explained. They expressed how the results are shown through the graphs and what the graphs represent. They explained how some of the large displacements on the graphs are where failure occurred because the building structure was too unbalanced. They also explained how the small displacements in the graph represent full cycles where there is the most balance implying that this is when the building structure is strongest. Unlike the textbook, the graphs were presented in a different section yet they were interpreted in the results. It is a different format which the authors most likely intended to do because it was more organized for the work they had to have presented.

After the results are shown, a discussion section is presented which is where the results are interpreted and analyzed. This section provides an opportunity to compare the results with previous studies or new information that was found during the experiment. The hypothesis is evaluated and the author expresses whether the results supported their claim or not. According to the textbook, the important findings are explained first, followed by major trends, magnitudes or values, associations, patterns of statistical significance, and exceptions. Problematic and failed data are also explained because it can help other researchers create new knowledge or inspire them to find another way to solve the question being asked. This is the section where if the results did not support the hypothesis, suggestions or explanations are made to encourage other researchers. In the lab report, the results were discussed and explained. They stated how the formulas were able to show the behavior of the steel they used and how it created a better balance in comparison to traditional connections. They explained the range differences between the variables they studied which were : the elastic range, the working range, and the high ductility range. These ranges were based on the force the building connections withstood and dealt with. All of these had a different displacement which had an effect on how stable the connections were.

As for the conclusion, all main points are restated in a paragraph or two and the hypothesis is reviewed. No new information is introduced.The most important findings are emphasized and this is the last opportunity to express the significance of the report to the reader. Additionally, the conclusion can offer recommendations for future research and how others could build on the already known findings of a topic. They can address unanswered questions and explore new concepts involving the same question. In the lab report, they did restate their reasoning for conducting the experiment and explained why their modifications to the CLT buildings are important. They learned how structural steel makes a more reliable connection than traditional connections. The authors also included the pros of having an innovative connection such as : higher ductility and low scattered results of failure. Their work mainly summarized the overstrength factors that should be considered when designing CLT structures. 

The common format of a lab report is a guide which ensures all aspects of the research are communicated clearly and effectively. There are many different ways to pass on necessary information and although the lab report, Capacity Design of Traditional and Innovative Ductile Connections for Earthquake-resistant CLT Structures, did not follow textbook format, it still had all the essential elements of a standard report. They presented the information in a manner that was most organized for their research which portrays a good communication aspect that is needed when writing lab reports. 

Citations

Markel, Michael H., and Stuart A. Selber. Technical Communication. 13th ed., Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2021. 
Trutalli, D. T., Marchi, L., Scotta, R., & Pozza, L. (2018, December 12). Capacity Design of Traditional and Innovative Ductile Connections for Earthquake-resistant CLT Structures. http://dol.org/10.1007/s10518-018-00536-6.

What is the Xbox Series X Controller?

The Xbox Series X is a very popular game console that was created in November 2020 by Microsoft. It is a part of the fourth generation of Xbox consoles which were intended to create significant performance, faster load times, and better frame rates for gamers. The Xbox Series X was created with a stronger chipmaker AMD, immersing experiences people have never seen before (Will Tuttle, 2020). Along with the console, an Xbox controller was designed as a primary input device to interact with the video games provided by the Xbox. There are multiple functions the controller serves which is why it is a significant part associated with the Xbox. It allows users to interact with the gaming console through inputs and it is designed to comfortably fit a wide range of users. Some have features like wireless connectivity and customizable options for buttons and triggers to enhance the user’s experience.

Mainboard

The innermost part of the remote consists of two boards. The first is the mainboard which contains four vibration motors, two analogs, and a wireless and control chip (Figure 1). The four vibration motors are behind each trigger which adds haptic feedback to the fingertips. The two analogs are created for movement control and navigation. They provide a way to scroll and make selections. The wireless and control chip is predominantly for wireless communication and processing. This chip allows the remote to connect to the Xbox without a physical wire. It also allows input data from the controller’s buttons and sends them to the console as commands to be executed.

The Second Board

The second board consists of silicone pads for controlling buttons and batteries (Figure 2). It connects to the boards and the outermost parts of the remote which holds the buttons in place. It has elements that make contact with the circuit boards when a button is pressed. It sends signals to the controllers’ processor which registers the press for the button. It also helps create soft feedback towards the gamer which ultimately ensures a more comfortable gaming experience. It is responsible for wireless connectivity and using radio frequency to maintain a stable connection. Between the two boards, there is something called a mini-jack connector (Figure 3). This allows players to connect a headset to the controller and hear game sounds and music directly through the headset. This helps the audio output and allows effective communication which overall enhances the gaming experience.

Buttons

This Xbox Series X controller has multiple buttons that are held together by the boards. It has four letter buttons labeled A, B, X, and Y. These buttons are placed on the right side of the controller in the formation of a diamond. The Y is in the top position, with the B button on the right, the X button on the left, and the A button on the bottom. They are the standard buttons used for different functions and game navigation (Figure 4). The exact roles can vary but they were designed to be easy to remember. An Xbox remote also has buttons known as the right stick button (RSB), left stick button (LSB), right bumper (RB), right trigger (RT), left bumper (LB), and left trigger (LT). These buttons are mainly used to interact with games and the console itself. They make it easier to search for any interests. The LB and RB are on the top part of the remote. It can be concluded its placement is there to be easily used by the pointer finger for comfort. Underneath each of those buttons, lays the triggers LT and RT. These help in-game movement and primary game actions (Figure 5).

On the bottom left of the remote, lies what is known as the d-pad. This is a plus-shaped button that adds to the ability to navigate through the console. It leaves more options if a user wants to create a customized setting and can help improve game mechanics. Above and to the left of the d-pad is the LSB. To the right of the d-pad is the RSB (Figure 6). The LSB and RSB are inputs added to the controller that also help improve gaming performance. They hold various functions and are created to make it easier for the user to perform actions without having to move fingers to a different part of the remote. All of these buttons work together to produce a smoother gaming experience.

In the top center of the remote lies the Xbox Button and three buttons directly underneath: the share button, menu button, and view button (Figure 7). The Xbox button is used to turn the console on and off, access the guide menu, and view notifications. The share button is used to quickly capture screenshots and record clips. This is mainly used during a game and saves significant moments. This is the first time an Xbox controller has a dedicated button for sharing and saving content. The menu button, also known as the “start” button, is the primary button to access options such as saving or quitting to return to the main menu. The view button, which was previously the “back” button on earlier Xbox controllers, allows the player to change settings and access another menu. It also can change the camera angle or switch to different viewing perspectives. These buttons help with organization and selecting the right applications. They are additional features created to make navigation quicker making the gaming experience more efficient.

Front and Back Panels

The front and the back panel are the parts that keep the whole remote together (Figure 8). The front panel, also known as the face of the controller, is where you can visually see all of the buttons and hold them in place presentably. It is designed to be for the user which means the layout, functionality, comfort, and control were all factors that were considered. The back panel also serves multiple key purposes. It holds the power source of the controller and is designed to be easily accessible for battery replacement or recharging. It also plays a big part in the structure of the controller by protecting the internal components. This part helped provide comfort, customizable options, and easy access to functions which make it a critical part of the controller’s design

Overall, Microsoft’s creation of the Xbox series along with the controller reflects the development of modern gaming. The very first Xbox was created in 2001 which was a huge stepping stone for Microsoft. Since then, they have created many upgraded consoles which led to the Xbox Series X. This console was created to emphasize high performance, fast loading times, and a new experience for users. Along with its controller, this creation continues nearly 20 years of development. The Xbox brand has become very popular in the gaming industry and continues to do so. It has become the most powerful console on the market.

Citations

Will Tuttle (He/Him), X. W. E. in C. (2021, February 24). Xbox series X: A closer look at the technology powering the next generation. Xbox Wire. https://news.xbox.com/en-us/2020/03/16/xbox-series-x-tech/ 

YouTube. (2021, December 8). How to completely disassemble an Xbox series X or series S controller. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3w2RFooS9c 262588213843476. (n.d.). Xbox Controller Button names and layout. Gist. https://gist.github.com/palmerj/586375bcc5bc83ccdaf00c6f5f863e86

Welcome to CUNY Academic Commons. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!